Taijiquan's potential by Mary Johnston |
Taijiquan teachers often use
the expression - “be strong in eight directions”. But what does this actually mean in practice?
Fundamental to understanding how the Chinese understand dynamic processes is
coming to terms with the character shi
which can be loosely translated as the “configuration of energy”, or we could
say latent energy. In texts from as far back as the Warring States and Qin
period the term shi can often be
found paired with the character xing,
“external shape”. For example, a boulder has a shape. If it is balanced at the edge
of a cliff it is said to have shi.
The term is used widely in the Chinese tradition to describe the manifestation
of energy from potential. China’s most revered military strategist Sunzi
described the potential of a rock perched on the edge of a cliff and the devastating
power that could be released from this quiet and harmless state. The art of war
teaches us to rely not on the likelihood of the enemy not coming, but on our
own readiness to receive him; not on the chance of him not attacking, but
rather on the fact that we have made our position unassailable. Similarly,
Taijiquan appears quiet on the surface, but a highly trained practitioner seeks
to be in a place of balance where they can instantly react to a force coming
from any direction.
Sunzi would have seen the potential of this rock perched high above the Grand Canyon perch |
John Hay (1994) in his
introduction to Boundaries in China describing
shi wrote: “Its boundaries are
therefore in time as well as space; they are never geometrically precise.
Instead of exterior planes, they have a changeable envelope of textured
energy”. Little wonder then that western Taijiquan players often misunderstand
their Chinese teachers. During one training camp in Chenjiagou a student asked
whether a particular movement was peng
or lu. The answer he received was,
“It could be peng and it could be lu”. That is, it had the potential to be
either depending upon the intention at that moment. The student walked away
confused and disappointed that they had not received a “straight answer”.